Most personal blogs don’t publish editorial standards. I do, because the publication you’re reading is in the business of telling other people how to be trustworthy on the web. If I asked you to take Technical SEO advice from someone whose own publishing principles weren’t transparent, you’d be right to close the tab.
This page exists to be specific about what I write, how I write it, where AI fits in, how I handle mistakes, and what financial relationships sit behind anything you read here. If anything below changes, I will update this page and note when.
What I write about and who for
The Technical SEO Library is a focused publication about Technical SEO and AI Search. The library covers crawl systems, indexation, schema markup, entity SEO, llms.txt and AI crawler management, retrieval optimisation, JavaScript SEO, site speed, log file analysis, and the engineering side of how Google and AI engines like ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and AI Overviews decide what to discover, understand, and cite.
I write for three audiences who often share the same problems. In-house marketers responsible for organic visibility. Developers shipping sites that need to be technically findable. And business owners trying to understand why their content is or isn’t getting picked up by the systems that now decide visibility. The work assumes you are willing to engage with technical material. It does not assume you arrived with a computer science degree.
I am Victor Afamefuna Ijomah, a UK-based Technical SEO Specialist with an M.Sc in Digital Marketing from the University of Chester. Everything published here passes through me as editor. There is no team of ghostwriters. There is no faceless “editorial team.” The work has one human accountable for it, which is the only way trust scales honestly.
How I write
Every piece in the library starts from a question I actually had, a problem I worked through with a client or my own sites, or a pattern I noticed in how engines were behaving and wanted to test. I do not publish thin coverage of topics I have not engaged with directly.
Claims about how search systems or AI engines work are sourced from primary documentation, official statements, or my own testing, wherever possible. When I am working from observation rather than confirmed behaviour, I say so. When I am uncertain, I say that too. The library is calibrated for people who would rather hear “I tested this and here is what I saw” than “Industry experts agree.”
Examples and case studies come from real work. Where I cannot share a client name, I anonymise the detail rather than fabricate it. Screenshots, log samples, and code snippets are real unless specifically marked as illustrative.
How I use AI
Yes, I use AI tools as part of my workflow. It would be dishonest not to say so in a publication about AI Search.
What AI helps me with: research synthesis, structuring outlines, stress-testing arguments, drafting variations to choose from, and second opinions on technical claims. What AI does not do: write final published copy in my voice; fabricate examples or case studies. I have not lived through generating claims of expertise. I do not hold or change my judgement on what to publish.
Every article passes through my voice, my edits, and my final approval. If a piece in the library makes a claim, I stand behind it personally, regardless of which tools helped me get there.
Corrections and updates
If you find an error in anything I have published, please email me at contact@victorijomah.com with the article URL and the issue. I take corrections seriously and aim to respond within 48 hours during the working week.
When I correct a substantive error, I update the article and add a visible note at the bottom stating what changed and when. For small typographical fixes, I update silently. For factual or analytical changes, the correction is always visible.
Technical SEO and AI Search both move quickly. I update articles when search behaviour, AI engine policy, or platform documentation changes meaningfully. Articles older than 12 months are reviewed for accuracy before being recommended in the library’s main navigation.
Independence and disclosures
I publish affiliate links to tools I use and recommend, including Hostinger, Semrush, Screaming Frog, and others. When you click an affiliate link and purchase, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. Affiliate relationships never influence which tools I recommend or how I evaluate them. If a tool I am affiliated with stops being the best choice, I will say so.
The Technical SEO Library does not publish sponsored content disguised as editorial. I do not accept payment in exchange for positive coverage, guest posts with embedded promotional links, or “thought leadership” placements. If a piece is sponsored or commercial in any way, it will be clearly labelled at the top.
I do client work in Technical SEO and AI Search through my professional practice. Client work and library editorial are kept separate. Clients do not get to influence what I publish, and library readers are not pitched services within editorial content.
How to reach me
For corrections, collaboration, or general questions, email contact@victorijomah.com.
This page was last reviewed on 21 May 2026.